🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," commented one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain politicians to follow this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Beyond Europe and the US, further nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers show that states around the world are no longer willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.