🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.